🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives buried in graves at risk from coastal erosion argue that indecision over how to tackle the problem is causing them unnecessary distress concerning the eternal homes of their loved ones.

An Impending Threat to Ancient Graveyards

Local authorities have identified three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being swallowed by the sea in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the situation sets out a range of possible actions, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and reburying them in more secure locations. Officials say it is for local people to determine how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It upsets me. My parents wanted this to serve as their final resting place, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Estimates indicate at least part of one graveyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner remembered a school trip to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the water, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that the deceased will just get carried away to sea. They won’t. People will collect remains as souvenirs and go grave robbing in search of treasures. That is completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the shore. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Peril

Further up the coast is situated the burial plot of a ex-soldier who died while serving overseas. His parent said she lost sleep after discovering her son’s grave might one day be moved.

“It does disturb me to consider this may not remain his permanent home,” she said. “For us it’s an important place to go.”

In her view, new interments should cease but says it is too soon to exhume existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Seeking Answers and Certainty

The lack of agreement over when and how to handle the problem has left grieving relatives feeling frustrated and anxious.

Several families want additional sea defences to delay the inevitable erosion and to allow burials to continue for now. Others contend the time for moving graves is approaching.

“It is very emotive,” said one relative. “The official study was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager said the burial sites were owned and managed of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is down to them to decide the direction to take. We are here to help support them through that process with communities.”

He added there was time to weigh all the choices. “This concerns many years before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should happen yet. It requires productive local conversations to discover the appropriate solutions for each village.”

The possibility of the loss of the historic sites was described as one of “profound sorrow for the area,” but faith leaders also spoke of a belief in life after death, offering a spiritual viewpoint on the physical disappearance of sacred ground.